How do you run B2B customer surveys
Learn how to run B2B customer surveys that generate insights: enterprise challenges, decision-maker engagement, account-based methods, and examples.
Subscribe to get news update
Avoid leading survey questions. Learn 20 real examples to avoid and how to write neutral wording so your surveys deliver unbiased, actionable feedback.
This article covers what leading questions are, why they matter in surveys, 20 real-world examples to avoid, and best practices for writing neutral questions. It is designed for product managers, researchers, and anyone designing surveys. Avoiding leading questions is essential for collecting reliable, unbiased feedback that reflects genuine experiences and supports sound business decisions.
Nobody writes leading questions on purpose (usually). As a survey creator, your role in crafting questions is crucial—leading questions often sneak in because:
You already believe something. When you think a feature is important, questions reflect that belief. “How much do you love our new design?” assumes they love it.
You want validation. Survey creators may consciously or unconsciously craft questions confirming their decisions. “Would you be disappointed if we removed this confusing feature?” sets up removal as the right answer.
You’re being helpful. You provide context or explanations that inadvertently suggest answers. “Many users find X helpful. How helpful do you find X?”
You’re using loaded language. Words carry connotations. “Innovative” and “cheap” both mean inexpensive, but one sounds positive and one negative.
Notion’s research team catches leading questions in peer reviews before surveys launch. A question like “How satisfied are you with our beautifully redesigned interface?” becomes “How satisfied are you with the current interface?”
Now that we've seen why leading questions occur in market research, let's look at concrete examples and how to fix them.
Leading questions contaminate data. Instead of learning what users actually think, you’re measuring how well your questions push them toward predetermined answers, which are often designed to achieve predetermined responses, intentionally or unintentionally. These predetermined responses can compromise data accuracy and make it difficult to obtain reliable data. Learn more about innovations in survey design that help avoid these pitfalls.
The damage appears when product decisions are based on false validation. For example, 85% of users might say a feature is “important” in a survey, but after building it, nobody uses it. This false feedback misleads decisions and causes missed improvement opportunities.
Dropbox once surveyed users asking “How valuable would it be to have unlimited storage?” with responses from “Very valuable” to “Not valuable.” 78% said very valuable. They almost prioritized unlimited storage based on this. Then someone pointed out the question was leading. Of course everyone wants unlimited storage when asked that way. They rewrote it neutrally: “What storage amount would meet your needs?” Most users said current limits were fine.
Notion’s research team catches leading questions in peer reviews before surveys launch. For example, “How satisfied are you with our beautifully redesigned interface?” is revised to “How satisfied are you with the current interface.” Now that you know the risks, let's explore examples and how to avoid leading questions.
Here are real examples from product surveys with explanations and neutral alternatives. Each example includes a brief explanation of the type of leading question, so you can identify and avoid them in your own surveys.
Type: Assumption-based
Assumption-based leading questions assume something about the respondents. (Fact Reference: 3)
Leading: “Don’t you think our new navigation is easier to use?”
Why it’s leading: “Don’t you think…” pressures agreement and steers respondents in a particular direction. The question structure assumes easier navigation and asks for confirmation.
Neutral alternative: “How easy or difficult is the navigation to use?” with scale from Very difficult to Very easy. For more information about ensuring data quality in surveys, including tackling online survey fraud in market research, read this article.
Type: Assumption-based
Assumption-based leading questions assume something about the respondents. (Fact Reference: 3)
Leading: “How much do you love our innovative new feature?”
Why it’s leading: “Love” and “innovative” are positive terms suggesting the feature is good and you should have positive feelings. The question also emphasizes a particular sentiment, focusing on positive emotions rather than remaining neutral.
Neutral alternative: “How would you rate the new feature?” with scale from Very unsatisfied to Very satisfied.
Type: Assumption-based
Assumption-based leading questions assume something about the respondents. (Fact Reference: 3)
Leading: “Which of our excellent features do you use most?”
Why it’s leading: Calling features “excellent” suggests they’re all good, influencing how users think about them. This is an example of assumption-based questions, which can bias responses and reduce data quality.
Neutral alternative: “Which features do you use most frequently?”
Type: Direct-implication
Direct-implication leading questions set the respondent up for future behavior, even if they weren't yet thinking that way. (Fact Reference: 1)
Leading: “How disappointed would you be if we removed this feature?”
Why it’s leading: This format (popularized by the Sean Ellis product-market fit test) is actually valid when used correctly, but becomes leading when asked about features you’re advocating to keep. The question assumes disappointment will occur, making it a form of direct implication questions.
Neutral alternative: “If this feature were no longer available, how would that affect your use of the product?” with options including:
Would not affect me
Would affect me somewhat
Would stop using the product
Type: Assumption-based
Assumption-based leading questions assume something about the respondents. (Fact Reference: 3)
Leading: “How does our product compare to slower, more complicated alternatives?”
Why it’s leading: Describing alternatives as “slower” and “more complicated” positions your product as better before asking for comparison, which can result in response bias.
Neutral alternative: “How does our product compare to other tools you’ve used?” or list specific competitor names neutrally.
Type: Coercive
Coercive leading questions force respondents to answer in only one way, typically in the affirmative. (Fact Reference: 2)
Leading: “Most users find this feature helpful. How helpful do you find it?”
Why it’s leading: Telling respondents what “most users” think pressures conformity, which can influence survey respondents to answer in line with perceived group norms. People don’t want to be the outlier.
Neutral alternative: “How helpful do you find this feature?” without mentioning what others think.
Figma tested this. Asking “How useful is auto-layout?” got 30% “very useful” responses. Prefacing it with “Many designers consider auto-layout essential” increased “very useful” to 52%. Same feature, different framing, dramatically different data.
Type: Interconnected statements
Leading questions with interconnected statements confuse the respondent by making a statement and then asking a follow-up question. (Fact Reference: 4)
Leading: “How satisfied are you with the speed and reliability of our product?”
Why it’s leading: This asks about two things (speed and reliability) in one question. Users might be satisfied with speed but not reliability. They’re forced to choose one answer for both.
Neutral alternative: Split into two separate questions:
“How satisfied are you with the product’s speed?”
“How satisfied are you with the product’s reliability?”
Type: Coercive
Coercive leading questions force respondents to answer in only one way, typically in the affirmative. (Fact Reference: 2)
Leading: “Would you be upset if we increased prices to continue providing the service you depend on?”
Why it’s leading: “Upset” is emotional language. “Depend on” implies necessity. The framing suggests price increases are about survival, not profit. This is an example of coercive leading questions, as it pressures respondents toward a particular emotional response.
Neutral alternative: “How would a 20% price increase affect your likelihood of continuing to use the product?” with specific answer options.
Type: Coercive
Coercive leading questions force respondents to answer in only one way, typically in the affirmative. (Fact Reference: 2)
Leading: “Do you think companies should prioritize user privacy?” (always/usually/sometimes/never)
Why it’s leading: There’s an obvious socially desirable answer, which can introduce survey bias. Everyone will say yes regardless of their actual behavior or priorities.
Neutral alternative: “When choosing software, how important is privacy compared to other factors?” with ranking exercise or trade-off questions.
Type: Interconnected statements
Leading questions with interconnected statements confuse the respondent by making a statement and then asking a follow-up question. (Fact Reference: 4)
Leading: "Do you have any complaints about our customer support or want to learn more about market research resources?"
Why it's leading: "Complaints" frames feedback negatively. Users might have mild suggestions but don't want to sound like complainers.
Neutral alternative:
"How would you rate your recent customer support experience?"
"What could improve your customer support experience?"
Type: Scale-based
Scale-based leading questions encourage a particular answer by providing an unfairly balanced rating scale. (Fact Reference: 5)
Leading: “How often do you use Feature X?” with options: Daily / Multiple times per week / Weekly
Why it’s leading: No option for “Never” or “Rarely” forces users who don’t use it into a usage frequency they don’t match, and not providing all possible answers can bias results.
Neutral alternative: Add full range:
Never
Rarely
Monthly
Weekly
Multiple times per week
Daily
Type: Assumption-based
Assumption-based leading questions assume something about the respondents. (Fact Reference: 3)
Leading: “How revolutionary do you find our AI-powered productivity solution?”
Why it’s leading: “Revolutionary” and “AI-powered productivity solution” are marketing terms, not neutral descriptors. They suggest the product is special and advanced. It's important to avoid jargon in survey questions to ensure clarity for all respondents.
Neutral alternative: “How would you describe the product?” with open-ended response or neutral rating scale.
Type: Coercive
Coercive leading questions force respondents to answer in only one way, typically in the affirmative. (Fact Reference: 2)
Leading: "Would you recommend our product to colleagues?"
Why it's leading: Binary yes/no doesn't capture nuance. Someone might recommend with caveats or only to certain people.
Neutral alternative:
"How likely are you to recommend this product?" with scale (NPS format)
"Under what circumstances would you recommend this product?"
If you're planning product research, recruiting the right participants is critical to obtaining actionable insights.
Type: Assumption-based
Assumption-based leading questions assume something about the respondents. (Fact Reference: 3)
Leading: “Are you completely satisfied with the checkout process?”
Why it’s leading: “Completely” sets an impossibly high bar. Few things are perfect, and this question can lead respondents to underreport their satisfaction. Users mentally adjust their real feelings downward to match this extreme standard.
Neutral alternative: “How satisfied are you with the checkout process?” with standard satisfaction scale.
Type: Interconnected statements
Leading questions with interconnected statements confuse the respondent by making a statement and then asking a follow-up question. (Fact Reference: 4)
Leading: “After updating the interface based on extensive user research, how would you rate the new design?”
Why it’s leading: Mentioning “extensive user research” suggests the design is validated and correct. This is an example of interconnected statements influencing responses, as the question combines a statement and a question to bias the answer. Users feel pressure to agree with research-backed decisions.
Neutral alternative: “How would you rate the new design?” without explaining the process behind it.
Calendly found that mentioning “we redesigned this based on your feedback” in survey questions increased positive ratings by 15 percentage points compared to asking without that context.
Type: Scale-based
Scale-based leading questions encourage a particular answer by providing an unfairly balanced rating scale. (Fact Reference: 5)
Leading: “Do you prefer Feature A or Feature B?” (only two options)
Why it’s leading: Forces a choice when users might prefer neither, like both equally, or not have an opinion.
Neutral alternative: Add options:
No preference
Like both equally
Dislike both
Providing comprehensive response options ensures more accurate data and helps respondents clearly understand their choices.
Type: Coercive
Coercive leading questions force respondents to answer in only one way, typically in the affirmative. (Fact Reference: 2)
Leading: “Knowing that we’re a small startup trying our best, how would you rate our support?” If you are interested in creating user-focused products, learn more about UX research methods product managers need to know.
Why it’s leading: Emotional context creates sympathy, making users softer in criticism. This can confuse respondents and affect the accuracy of their feedback. You’re measuring niceness, not actual support quality.
Neutral alternative: “How would you rate your support experience?” without context about company size or effort.
Type: Direct-implication
Direct-implication leading questions set the respondent up for future behavior, even if they weren't yet thinking that way. (Fact Reference: 1)
Leading: “When you upgrade to our premium plan, which features will you use most?”
Why it’s leading: “When” assumes they’ll upgrade, not “if.” This subtle word choice pushes them toward seeing upgrade as inevitable and presumes their future behavior. For more on how careful language and survey optimization techniques improve decision-making, explore our 2024 guide.
Neutral alternative: “If you were considering our premium plan, which features would be most valuable to you?”
Type: Scale-based
Scale-based leading questions encourage a particular answer by providing an unfairly balanced rating scale. (Fact Reference: 5)
Leading: “On a scale from good to excellent, how would you rate this feature?”
Why it’s leading: The scale starts at “good,” excluding negative options. This is an example of scale-based leading questions, where the rating scale is skewed to force positive feedback even from dissatisfied users.
Neutral alternative: “How would you rate this feature?” with balanced scale:
Very poor
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
Type: Assumption-based
Assumption-based leading questions assume something about the respondents. (Fact Reference: 3)
Leading: "Since you clearly enjoy using our product, what improvements would you suggest?"
Why it's leading: "Clearly enjoy" assumes positive sentiment, potentially contradicting how the user actually feels. Users who don't enjoy it feel invalidated.
Neutral alternative: "What improvements would you suggest for the product?"
Effective survey design and careful question wording are crucial for creating unbiased survey questions that yield accurate and reliable insights. Selecting appropriate data collection methods and maintaining a strong focus on data quality are also essential for obtaining reliable survey results. By prioritizing these elements, you can ensure your surveys produce actionable data that supports better decision-making.
Provide equal positive and negative options. Well-designed rating scale questions help ensure balanced feedback. If you have “Very satisfied” and “Satisfied,” also include “Dissatisfied” and “Very dissatisfied,” plus a neutral midpoint.
Standard good scale:
Very dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
Satisfied
Very satisfied
Replace subjective descriptors with neutral language in B2B online surveys.
Instead of: innovative, revolutionary, simple, beautiful, powerful, excellent
Use: new, current, or just describe objectively without adjectives
Start with what users do, then ask how they feel about it.
Better order:
“How often do you use Feature X?”
“How satisfied are you with Feature X?”
This grounds attitude questions in actual usage rather than hypothetical preferences. This approach also helps generate more actionable insights from survey data.
Always give users an out if your predefined options don't match their reality.
Every multiple choice should include:
Other (please specify)
None of the above / Not applicable
Before sending surveys to users, test questions with team members who don’t know your desired answers. Use this process:
Share your draft survey with colleagues not involved in writing it.
Ask them: “What answer do you think I want?”
If they can guess, the question is leading.
It’s also important to test your survey questions with a sample from your target audience to ensure clarity and effectiveness before full deployment.
Linear’s research team tests all survey questions with the customer success team first. They’re close to users but not close to product decisions, making them good unbiased testers.
Consider running a pilot test before launching the full survey to identify and correct any issues.
Both leading and loaded questions can compromise data integrity by influencing how respondents answer, which can undermine the accuracy and reliability of your research data. Loaded questions are a more extreme form of leading questions—often emotionally charged or implying a socially desirable answer—and should be avoided to maintain data integrity.
Earlier questions influence later answers even if individual questions are neutral.
Example sequence:
“Do you value security in software?”
“How would you rate our product?”
Question 1 primes users to think about security, making them weigh it more heavily when rating your product in Question 2, even if security wasn’t important to them before you asked.
Fix: Randomize question order when possible, or at minimum ask specific questions (how would you rate security) before general ones (overall rating). Additionally, ensure you ask the same questions in the same order across surveys to help maintain data comparability and support accurate analysis.
The order of multiple choice options influences selection, especially on mobile where users see fewer options at once.
Best practices:
Randomize order when options are equal (feature lists)
The order in which respondents answer questions can be influenced by how options are placed. To avoid bias and ensure genuine responses, carefully consider option placement.
Maintain logical order for scales (always go from negative to positive or vice versa consistently)
Put most common answers early for factual questions to reduce scrolling
When asking about preferences between two things, users often want “both” or “neither” options you didn’t provide, especially when conducting qualitative and quantitative research studies.
Notion surveyed users: “Do you prefer databases or documents for project management?” Most users use both for different purposes. The forced choice produced useless data.
Fix: Add options such as:
Use both about equally
Depends on the project
Neither - I use something else
Including comprehensive options like these helps collect more meaningful data.
Sometimes being specific becomes leading.
Specific but leading: “How satisfied are you with our 24/7 customer support?” (This is a common issue in customer survey questions.)
Why it’s a problem: Mentioning “24/7” highlights a positive attribute, potentially influencing ratings upward. For efficient recruitment of experts and participants for research, consider using CleverX.
Better: “How satisfied are you with customer support?” then separately ask about support availability if that specifically matters. Understanding buyer behavior trends in 2025 can further enhance how you assess customer satisfaction and support needs.
The rule: Include specific details only when necessary for clarity, not when they’re persuasive selling points.
Teams defend leading questions with these rationalizations—issues that often arise in feedback surveys:
“We need to educate users first”: No. Education before questions biases answers. If users don’t understand the question, it’s too complicated.
“We’re just being friendly”: Friendly tone is fine. Suggesting answers isn’t.
“Everyone asks it this way”: Bandwagon fallacy. Common leading questions are still leading.
“We need positive feedback for stakeholders”: Then you want validation, not research. Be honest about that.
“The sales team needs proof”: Get proof from real metrics and neutral research, not manufactured survey results.
If you realize too late that your questions were leading, you still have options to address the issue and improve your data quality.
Review your collected responses to identify patterns of bias.
Consider segmenting your data to see if certain groups were more influenced by the leading questions.
If possible, re-contact participants with revised, neutral survey questions to clarify or validate their responses.
Document the issue and your corrective actions for transparency in your research report.
Taking these steps helps ensure more reliable data in future surveys.
When presenting results, note that questions were leading and explain how this might affect data. For example:
“Our questions assumed users wanted Feature X. Results likely overstate actual interest.”
Acknowledging these limitations is essential for turning survey results into actionable data that can drive informed business decisions.
Check if survey responses match actual behavior. If 85% said a feature was “important” but only 12% use it, the survey data was contaminated. Comparing quantitative data from surveys, such as responses collected using rating scales, to actual behavioral data can reveal discrepancies between what participants say and what they do.
Test the same topics with properly written questions. Compare results to see how much bias affected the original data. Stripe found this approach valuable. After a leading survey about pricing suggested huge upgrade interest, they resurveyed with neutral questions. Real upgrade intent was half what the leading survey indicated. This saved them from building pricing infrastructure for demand that didn't exist.
Good survey writing is a skill teams develop over time. Fostering a bias-free culture helps encourage respondents to provide honest feedback.
No survey goes out without at least one person reviewing for leading questions who wasn't involved in writing it. Figma requires surveys to go through peer review before launch. Reviewers specifically look for bias and leading questions.
Build a library of well-written neutral questions for common topics (satisfaction, likelihood to recommend, usage frequency), including open ended question formats. Reuse good questions rather than reinventing each time.
When you catch leading questions, share them with the team explaining why they’re problematic—especially noting that direct implication leading questions are a common pitfall to watch for. Learning from mistakes prevents repeating them.
Product managers, designers, and engineers often write survey questions, especially when . Train them on avoiding bias even if they’re not research specialists.
Be clear about your goal. Research seeks to learn. Validation seeks to confirm. Mixing these creates bias. If you need validation for stakeholders, run proper AB tests or use metrics. Don't masquerade validation as research.
Beyond avoiding leading questions, encourage honest responses and ensure that respondents interpret questions consistently:
Emphasize anonymity: “Your responses are anonymous and won’t affect your account.”
Explain why you’re asking: “We’re trying to understand how people actually use the product so we can improve it.” Not “We want to confirm our decisions were right.”
Provide skip options: “Prefer not to answer” or “No opinion” reduce pressure to give responses users don’t have.
Keep surveys short: Long surveys tire people out. Tired respondents give lower quality, more biased answers.
Thank respondents genuinely: “Your honest feedback helps us build better products” not “Thanks for validating our decisions.”
Bad survey data is worse than no data. It creates false confidence in wrong decisions.
Leading questions produce data that tells you what you want to hear, not what's true. You make decisions, commit resources, build features, then discover users don't actually want what your survey "proved" they wanted.
The cost isn't the wasted survey. It's the wasted development time, the opportunity cost of not building what users actually needed, and the damaged trust when you ship things users explicitly said they wanted (because your questions led them) but don't use.
Write neutral questions. Get honest answers. Make better products.
Access identity-verified professionals for surveys, interviews, and usability tests. No waiting. No guesswork. Just real B2B insights - fast.
Book a demoJoin paid research studies across product, UX, tech, and marketing. Flexible, remote, and designed for working professionals.
Sign up as an expertInstantly discover and recruit world-class industry experts, C-suite executives and consultants for research.
