AI with medical experts helps US pharma firm cut trial amendments by 29%

29% fewer protocol amendments

Quality and compliance gains

14 clinical research specialists

Experts recruited

48-hour deployment

Swift launch support

About our client

A US-based pharmaceutical company with 3,200 employees developing therapies in oncology, neurology, and rare diseases. The company runs about 35 active clinical trials annually with combined budgets of $420 million. With protocol amendments costing $535,000 on average and causing three-month delays, it sought AI-driven support to optimize designs and prevent costly mid-study changes.

Industry
Pharmaceutical - Clinical development
Share

Objective

The company aimed to develop an AI system capable of analyzing clinical trial protocols, identifying potential operational challenges, and predicting patient recruitment obstacles. The model needed to assess site feasibility, anticipate regulatory queries, and optimize inclusion/exclusion criteria while balancing scientific rigor with practical execution across multiple countries and healthcare systems.

The challenge

The company encountered persistent clinical trial design challenges:

  • Protocol complexity: Average protocols containing 180 endpoints with unclear prioritization
  • Site variability: Trials spanning 15 countries with different standard-of-care practices
  • Recruitment failures: 42% of trials missing enrollment targets by 6+ months
  • Amendment burden: Average 2.4 protocol amendments per study disrupting timelines
  • Regulatory diversity: Navigating 22 different health authority requirements
  • Cost overruns: 31% of trials exceeding budget due to design flaws

Previous protocol reviews by junior clinical staff identified only 38% of operational issues. Standard protocol templates couldn't account for therapeutic area nuances or predict real-world execution challenges.

CleverX solution

CleverX deployed a targeted clinical trial optimization program:

Clinical expert network:

  • Engaged 14 senior professionals including clinical operations directors and medical monitors
  • Required minimum 8 years Phase II/III trial experience for participation
  • Recruited former FDA medical reviewers familiar with regulatory expectations
  • Included patient recruitment specialists and site investigators

Protocol assessment framework:

  • Developed feasibility scoring for 95 common protocol elements
  • Created recruitment projection models for 60 disease populations
  • Built regulatory risk matrices for 120 protocol features
  • Established site burden assessments for 85 procedural requirements

Quality protocols:

  • Implemented review by both medical and operational perspectives
  • Required consensus from 3 experts on high-risk design elements
  • Created test scenarios from historical protocol failures
  • Maintained calibration using 280 completed trials

Impact

The systematic training improved trial design quality:

Weeks 1-2: Historical protocol analysis

  • Processed 175 executed protocols over 5 years
  • Generated 8,200 annotations linking design to outcomes
  • Achieved 87% agreement on operational risk rankings
  • Identified 134 patterns associated with successful enrollment

Weeks 3-5: Optimization development

  • Analyzed 3,400 protocol sections with feasibility assessments
  • Created 1,450 inclusion criteria modifications with rationale
  • Produced 980 site burden calculations
  • Developed 620 regulatory response predictions

Weeks 6-7: Validation & testing

  • Tested against 85 recently completed trials
  • Conducted stress testing with rare disease protocols
  • Performed therapeutic area-specific assessments
  • Validated predictions against actual trial performance

Analytical methods:

  • Patient population modeling using epidemiology data
  • Site capability matching algorithms
  • Competitive trial landscape impact analysis
  • Protocol complexity scoring against execution risk

Result

Design quality improvements:

CleverX's approach reduced design flaws and improved predictive accuracy.

  • 29% reduction in protocol amendments post-launch
  • 67% accuracy predicting enrollment challenges
  • 71% success identifying problematic inclusion criteria
  • 2.1X faster protocol finalization

Operational benefits:

The system accelerated timelines and reduced overall costs.

  • Reduced average enrollment timeline by 2.3 months
  • Decreased per-protocol costs by $380,000
  • Avoided 11 trial failures through design optimization
  • Saved $8.9 million in amendment-related expenses

Strategic advantages:

The client built long-term capabilities and market credibility.

  • Created repository of 8,200 protocol optimization insights
  • Decreased protocol development time by 35%
  • Improved site satisfaction scores by 41%
  • Accelerated 3 drug approvals through better trial design

The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative recognized this approach as industry best practice.

Discover how CleverX can streamline your B2B research needs

Book a free demo today!

Trusted by participants