Pricing research provides the data foundation for pricing decisions that directly impact revenue. Learn systematic methods to reveal customer willingness to pay and identify optimal price points.
Pricing determines whether your product succeeds or fails in the market.
Common pricing strategies are established methods businesses use to set prices effectively, helping them align with business goals and market conditions.
Set prices too high and customers choose competitors or delay purchases. Price too low and you leave revenue on the table while signaling lower quality than alternatives. The difference between optimal pricing and guesswork often represents millions in annual revenue for growing companies. Pricing research helps businesses select and refine pricing strategies to maximize profit by providing data-driven insights into customer preferences and competitor pricing.
Pricing research eliminates guesswork by measuring how customers actually respond to different price points. Rather than assuming what people will pay, systematic research reveals their true willingness to pay, identifies the price sensitivity range where demand shifts dramatically, and quantifies trade-offs between price and features. Pricing market research is a systematic approach to understanding customer willingness to pay and market dynamics, ensuring your pricing decisions are informed and competitive.
This guide provides product managers and marketing teams with frameworks for conducting pricing research that produces actionable pricing strategy recommendations rather than interesting but unusable data.
Pricing represents the fastest lever for improving profitability. A 1 percent price increase typically generates 8 to 11 percent profit improvement, far exceeding equivalent gains from volume increases or cost reductions. Pricing decisions have a direct impact on profit margin and must take into account both fixed and variable costs to ensure sustainable profitability. Yet most organizations spend less effort researching price than they invest in product features or messaging.
Value based pricing is another effective strategy, as it sets prices based on the perceived value to the customer, helping businesses align pricing with market demand and improve profitability.
Price communicates value before customers experience your product. Premium pricing signals quality and exclusivity. Budget pricing promises accessibility and value. Mid-market pricing suggests balanced capabilities. Setting a premium price can enhance perceived value and signal exclusivity, attracting customers who associate higher prices with superior quality.
Research from the Journal of Marketing shows that price changes influence perceived quality independent of actual product attributes. A wine priced at $90 tastes better to consumers than the identical wine priced at $10, even when they know prices were assigned randomly. This perception effect means pricing decisions shape brand positioning as much as marketing campaigns do. Additionally, pricing norms in the market influence customer expectations and perceptions of value, guiding how prices are interpreted relative to competitors.
B2B products with multiple editions, add-on features, and usage-based components create pricing complexity where intuition fails. In these scenarios, selecting the right pricing approach and exploring different pricing strategies is crucial to address the complexity and optimize outcomes. Research quantifies which features justify premium pricing, which drive adoption at entry tiers, and how customers trade off capabilities against cost.
SaaS pricing models with monthly or annual commitments require understanding not just initial willingness to pay but also price sensitivity across renewal cycles. Pricing research for subscription products must account for acquisition pricing separate from expansion and retention pricing considerations. Systematic research helps determine pricing for products with multiple editions or features, ensuring decisions are data-driven and aligned with market realities.
Multiple pricing research methods exist because different business situations require different approaches. Understanding when each method applies prevents wasted research investment and inappropriate conclusions. Pricing techniques and pricing studies are essential tools for understanding customer willingness to pay and for setting effective pricing strategies.
Direct pricing research methods, such as those described in the following subsections, provide actionable data for pricing decisions.
The Van Westendorp pricing model is a survey-based approach that asks four questions to establish the range of acceptable pricing. Survey respondents are asked to identify acceptable prices and their responses help determine customers willingness to pay:
At what price would you consider this product to be so expensive that you would not consider buying it (too expensive)?
At what price would you consider this product to be priced so low that you would feel the quality could not be very good (too cheap)?
At what price would you consider this product starting to get expensive, so that it is not out of the question, but you would have to give some thought to buying it (expensive)?
At what price would you consider the product to be a bargain, a great buy for the money (cheap)?
Plotting cumulative frequencies of these responses identifies four key price points. The Point of Marginal Cheapness shows where too many respondents question quality. The Point of Marginal Expensiveness indicates where too many find it expensive. The optimum price point sits where equal numbers find the price expensive and cheap. The Indifference Price Point marks where equal numbers say it is too expensive versus too cheap.
This methodology works best for established product categories where customers have existing price expectations. It provides a pricing range rather than a single optimal price, which helps product managers understand flexibility in pricing strategy. The Van Westendorp pricing model provides valuable insights into customer price perceptions and helps identify the optimum price point for a product.
Van Westendorp requires 50 to 100 potential buyers as survey respondents for stable results. Sample sizes below 50 produce unreliable intersections. The method assumes customers can accurately estimate what they would pay, which works better for considered purchases than impulse buys.
The Gabor-Granger pricing method presents a product concept at a specific price and asks a simple purchase intent question: Would you buy this product at this price? This technique gauges customers' willingness to purchase at various price points, providing insight into demand elasticity and customer preferences.
Respondents are first asked about their purchase intent at the highest price. If they say yes, they receive a higher price with the same question repeated. If they say no, they are presented with a lower price. This iteration continues until researchers identify each respondent’s maximum willingness to pay.
Aggregating individual thresholds across a sample produces a demand curve showing what percentage of the market would purchase at each price point. Revenue optimization analysis multiplies purchase likelihood by price to identify the price that maximizes expected revenue.
The method provides clear, actionable data because it measures actual stated purchase intent rather than abstract price perceptions. This allows businesses to set prices based on real customer responses, improving pricing accuracy and revenue potential. It works particularly well for new product pricing where customers lack reference points for Van Westendorp comparative questions.
Gabor-Granger typically requires 200 to 300 respondents for statistically reliable demand curves. Smaller samples produce noisy data that makes revenue optimization unreliable. The method works best when you can test 5 to 7 distinct price points to map the full demand curve shape.
Limitations include hypothetical bias where stated intent overstates actual purchase behavior and the method’s inability to capture feature trade-offs since it tests holistic products at different prices.
Conjoint analysis measures how customers value specific product or service attributes by presenting combinations of features at various prices and asking respondents to choose between options or rate their preference. This approach is widely used to price products and offerings by evaluating customer preferences and willingness to pay.
This method quantifies the relative importance of each feature and calculates the premium customers will pay for specific capabilities. Unlike Van Westendorp or Gabor-Granger which test overall products, conjoint breaks down value attribution to individual features and helps identify the inherent value of each feature in the context of the overall product or service.
Choice-based conjoint, also known as discrete choice modeling, presents realistic purchase scenarios where respondents select their preferred option from a set of alternatives, mimicking actual buying decisions. Rating-based conjoint asks respondents to score each concept, providing more data points per respondent but less behavioral realism.
Conjoint excels at answering specific product management questions: Should we include feature X in the base package or charge separately? How much premium does feature Y command? Which feature combination optimizes revenue?
The methodology requires careful experimental design. Each respondent evaluates 8 to 15 product configurations showing different feature and price combinations. Algorithms determine which combinations to test to efficiently estimate all attribute values.
Sample size requirements depend on the number of features tested. Studies with 4 to 5 features need 200 to 300 respondents. Complex analyses testing 8 to 10 features require 400 to 500 respondents for stable results.
Conjoint analysis represents the most sophisticated pricing research method but also requires the most expertise to design and analyze correctly. Product teams often partner with specialized research firms for conjoint studies rather than attempting them internally.
Monadic testing shows each respondent only one price point, avoiding the anchoring effects that occur when people see multiple prices in sequence. Half the sample might see a $99 price while the other half sees $129, with purchase intent compared between groups.
This approach produces cleaner data than sequential methods because respondents cannot use previously seen prices as reference points. It works particularly well for testing price increases on existing products where you want to measure cannibalization risk without biasing customer expectations.
The trade-off involves sample size. Since each respondent sees only one condition, you need larger total samples to test multiple price points with statistical confidence. Testing four prices requires four times the sample size of methods where each person evaluates all prices.
Monadic testing typically requires 100 to 150 respondents per price point tested. Testing five prices therefore needs 500 to 750 total respondents, making this an expensive approach when exploring wide price ranges. However, monadic testing can also be used to validate pricing decisions by comparing actual sales volume at different price points, providing real-world data to support optimal pricing strategies.
Understanding methodologies matters less than executing research that produces decisions. Implementation determines whether research generates actionable insights or just interesting data. Ensuring that your pricing research is designed to reach the intended target audience is essential for obtaining accurate and relevant results.
Pricing research must answer specific questions that directly inform decisions. Generic objectives like “understand pricing” waste resources. Precise objectives like “identify the optimal price for our premium tier that maximizes revenue among existing customers likely to upgrade” focus research appropriately. Clear objectives also help businesses identify the right price for their offerings, ensuring prices are both competitive and profitable.
Start by identifying the actual decision this research will inform. Are you launching a new product and need to set initial pricing? Considering a price increase and want to quantify churn risk? Adding a premium tier and need to determine what price gap justifies the feature difference?
Write these decisions explicitly before designing research. Then ensure your methodology and questions directly address those decisions rather than gathering tangentially interesting information.
Pricing research quality depends entirely on reaching respondents who represent your actual target market. Testing prices with the wrong audience produces dangerously misleading conclusions. To ensure valid pricing insights, your research sample must accurately reflect your target customers, as different pricing strategies may be needed for distinct customer segments.
Define screening criteria that match your ideal customer profile. For B2B products, this includes company size, industry, job function, and buying authority. For consumer products, consider demographics, usage behavior, and purchase frequency.
Sample size requirements vary by methodology but generally follow these guidelines:
Van Westendorp requires 50 to 100 respondents minimum, 150 to 200 for confident recommendations.
Gabor-Granger needs 200 to 300 respondents to map stable demand curves.
Conjoint analysis demands 200 to 500 respondents depending on the number of features tested.
Monadic testing requires 100 to 150 respondents per price point, multiplied by the number of prices tested.
Recruitment channels should match where your customers naturally engage. B2B research often requires specialized panels or outreach through professional networks. Consumer research works well with online panels, social media recruitment, or existing customer databases.
How you describe the product being priced significantly affects willingness to pay estimates. Overly optimistic descriptions inflate price tolerance while sparse descriptions suppress it. Effective product descriptions can also positively influence consumer sentiment and perceived value, which are critical for reliable pricing research outcomes.
Provide enough context that respondents understand what they are evaluating but avoid marketing hyperbole that sets unrealistic expectations. Include key features, core benefits, and relevant comparisons to alternatives they already know.
For new products, consider showing prototypes, screenshots, or detailed specifications rather than relying on text descriptions alone. Visual context helps respondents form accurate value perceptions.
Test whether your description communicates effectively by asking a subset of respondents to explain the product in their own words. Significant misunderstandings indicate your description needs refinement before fielding the full study.
No single pricing research method provides perfect accuracy. Each makes different assumptions and measures willingness to pay from different angles. Selecting the appropriate pricing method for each research objective is crucial to obtaining reliable results. Combining complementary methods validates findings and increases confidence.
A thorough pricing research program might sequence methods strategically:
Start with qualitative interviews to understand how customers think about value and pricing in your category. Unstructured conversations reveal the language customers use and the trade-offs they consider.
Run Van Westendorp to establish an acceptable price range and identify obvious floor and ceiling prices. This quick method provides initial boundaries for more detailed testing.
Execute conjoint analysis to quantify feature values and test alternative packaging configurations. This determines which features justify premium pricing.
Conduct Gabor-Granger or monadic testing on your leading price candidates to validate demand at specific points and optimize final pricing decisions.
This staged approach invests research budget progressively, using quick methods to frame questions that slower, more expensive methods answer precisely.
Collecting pricing data represents only half the challenge. Translating research findings into confident pricing decisions requires systematic analysis and realistic interpretation. These findings are often used to determine demand at different price points, helping businesses assess customer willingness to pay and identify optimal pricing strategies.
Demand curves from Gabor-Granger research show how purchase intent changes across price points. Steep drops indicate high price sensitivity where small increases significantly reduce demand. Flat sections suggest price insensitivity where you can increase prices without major volume impact.
The revenue-maximizing price sits where price multiplied by expected demand reaches its peak. However, optimal pricing considers factors beyond immediate revenue. Market share objectives might justify prices below the revenue-maximizing point. Premium positioning strategy might target prices above it to signal quality.
Calculate the price elasticity coefficient, the percentage change in demand for each 1 percent price change. Elasticity above 1.0 indicates elastic demand where price increases hurt revenue. Elasticity below 1.0 suggests inelastic demand where price increases grow revenue despite volume decreases.
All pricing research methods involve hypothetical purchase scenarios that differ from actual buying contexts. Stated willingness to pay typically exceeds actual behavior by 10 to 30 percent because hypothetical questions lack the friction of real financial commitment.
Apply conservative adjustments to raw research findings. If Gabor-Granger shows 60 percent would purchase at $99, assume actual conversion might be 45 to 50 percent. This discounting protects against overpricing based on inflated research responses.
Context matters significantly. Research conducted when customers are not actively shopping produces different results than research during active purchase consideration. Timing your research to match real buying cycles improves accuracy.
Pricing research provides direction but market testing validates decisions with real revenue at stake. Before committing to new pricing across your entire customer base, test with controlled segments.
A/B test pricing with new customer acquisitions, showing different prices to similar audiences and measuring actual conversion rates. This validates research findings with real purchase behavior.
For existing customers, test price increases with small segments first. Monitor not just immediate churn but also longer-term retention, expansion, and referral behavior. Some customers tolerate price increases initially but churn at renewal.
Pilot premium tiers with engaged customers likely to adopt them before launching broadly. Their feedback refines positioning and validates whether the feature-price combination resonates.
Market testing provides the ultimate market validation that research recommendations work in practice, not just in theory.
Even well-designed pricing research encounters obstacles that compromise findings if not addressed proactively. One such challenge is that the perception of cheap prices can undermine perceived value, making it harder for businesses to strike the right balance between attracting customers and maintaining profitability.
Respondents consistently overstate their willingness to pay in research contexts because no actual purchase obligation exists. They evaluate products more favorably and tolerate higher prices than they would when spending real money.
Mitigation strategies include using realistic purchase scenarios with budget trade-offs, emphasizing that responses inform actual product pricing to encourage thoughtful answers, and calibrating results based on industry benchmarks for hypothetical bias in your product category.
Some researchers incorporate real purchase obligations where a subset of respondents must actually buy at the prices they said they would accept. This approach increases response accuracy but significantly complicates research logistics.
When researching price changes for existing products, customers anchor on current prices and resist increases regardless of value justification. This anchoring effect depresses measured willingness to pay below what new customers would accept.
Test prices with both existing customers and prospects separately. Existing customer research measures retention risk from price changes. Prospect research measures what pricing attracts new business without incumbent price anchoring.
For existing customer research, frame questions carefully to distinguish between fair pricing for new features versus acceptable increases for unchanged offerings. Customers tolerate increases more readily when tied to clear capability improvements.
Customer price sensitivity depends heavily on competitive alternatives and category reference prices. Research that ignores competitive context produces findings disconnected from market realities. Market research plays a crucial role in understanding market dynamics, helping businesses evaluate competing brands, set appropriate prices, and align pricing strategies with customer preferences and broader market conditions.
Include competitive pricing in your research design. Show respondents how your pricing compares to alternatives. Measure willingness to pay premium or discount relative to known competitors rather than in isolation.
Conjoint analysis naturally incorporates competitive context by including competitor features and prices as choice alternatives. Van Westendorp and Gabor-Granger require explicit competitive framing in product descriptions.
Online panels and convenient sampling methods often produce samples that systematically differ from your actual target market. Price-sensitive bargain hunters over-represent themselves in research motivated by incentives.
Invest in recruitment quality rather than maximizing sample size cheaply. Verify that respondents match your customer profile through screening questions and data validation. For B2B research, confirm job titles, company attributes, and buying authority.
Compare research sample characteristics against known customer data to identify representation gaps. If your customers are 60 percent enterprise and 40 percent mid-market but your sample is 50-50, weight results to match actual customer distribution.
Pricing research is the systematic process of measuring customer willingness to pay, quantifying price sensitivity, and identifying optimal price points through methods like conjoint analysis, Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter, and Gabor-Granger testing. This research provides data-driven foundations for pricing strategy rather than relying on cost-plus formulas or competitive matching.
The best pricing research methods depend on your specific situation. Van Westendorp works well for established product categories where customers have reference prices. Conjoint analysis excels at valuing individual features for packaging decisions. Gabor-Granger provides clear demand curves for new product pricing. Most robust pricing research combines multiple methods for validation.
Pricing research sample size requirements vary by methodology. Van Westendorp requires 50 to 100 respondents minimum, Gabor-Granger needs 200 to 300, conjoint analysis demands 200 to 500 depending on complexity, and monadic testing requires 100 to 150 per price point tested. Larger samples increase statistical confidence and allow for segment analysis.
Determine optimal pricing through systematic research that measures customer willingness to pay, identifies price sensitivity ranges, and quantifies feature value. Combine multiple research methods starting with Van Westendorp to establish price ranges, conjoint analysis to value specific features, and Gabor-Granger to optimize final pricing. Validate research findings through market testing before full rollout.
Pricing research measures customer willingness to pay and value perception through direct research with target buyers. Competitive analysis examines competitor pricing, positioning, and packaging through secondary research. Effective pricing strategy requires both, understanding what customers will pay and how competitive alternatives are priced, then positioning your offering strategically within that context.
Pricing research transforms pricing from educated guessing into data-driven strategy that maximizes revenue and market position.
The systematic application of appropriate research methodologies reveals how customers actually value your product, which features command premium pricing, and where price increases would trigger unacceptable churn. Organizations that invest in rigorous pricing research consistently outperform those relying on cost-plus formulas or simple competitive matching.
Success requires matching research methods to specific decisions, recruiting representative samples that reflect your actual target market, and interpreting findings conservatively with validation through market testing. The methodology matters less than execution discipline and realistic application of insights.
Access identity-verified professionals for surveys, interviews, and usability tests. No waiting. No guesswork. Just real B2B insights - fast.
Book a demoJoin paid research studies across product, UX, tech, and marketing. Flexible, remote, and designed for working professionals.
Sign up as an expertInstantly discover and recruit world-class industry experts, C-suite executives and consultants for research.
