Find the right expert network to gain real-time industry insights and specialized expertise. Compare models, pricing, and vetting processes.
.png)
Explore the pros and cons of expert networks and user interviews to find the right research method for your needs. Read more to make an informed choice.
Product teams face a constant dilemma: should you talk to end users or industry experts? The answer is not either or it is knowing when each method delivers the insights you need.
User interviews help you understand what your customers want. Expert networks help you understand how to deliver it successfully. But mix them up, and you will waste time, money, and end up with the wrong insights.
This guide breaks down exactly when to use expert networks versus user interviews, so you can make smarter research decisions and build better products.
Before we dive deep, let's establish the basics.
Who you talk to: Your target end-users and customers the people who will actually use your product daily.
What you learn: User needs, behaviors, pain points, workflows, and how they interact with your product.
Example: If you are building project management software, you would interview project managers about their daily workflows, what frustrates them about current tools, and how they organize their tasks.
Who you talk to: Domain experts, industry veterans, former executives, and specialists who have deep knowledge about your market, industry, or technical domain.
What you learn: Industry insights, market trends, competitive intelligence, technical feasibility, and strategic perspectives.
Example: For that same project management software, you would interview former VPs of Engineering at tech companies to understand how enterprises evaluate and buy project management tools, what the procurement process looks like, and what compliance requirements matter.
The key distinction? Users tell you what they need. Experts tell you how to succeed in the market.
User interviews are your go-to research method when you need to understand the people who will actually use your product. Here is when they are most valuable:
Use user interviews when you need to answer:
Real example: When Notion was just starting, they spent months interviewing knowledge workers about how they organized information. They discovered that people were duct-taping together multiple tools Evernote for notes, Trello for tasks, Google Docs for collaboration and desperately wanted one unified workspace.
These interviews did not come from "productivity experts." They came from real users struggling with real problems. That insight led to Notion's everything-in-one-place positioning.
Before you build, you need to know if your solution actually solves the problem.
Use user interviews to test:
The key is asking about past behavior, not hypothetical futures. Don't ask "Would you use this?" Ask "Tell me about the last time you tried to solve this problem. What did you do?"
Once you have built something, user interviews (combined with observation) reveal where your product fails.
Use user interviews to discover:
Watch them use your product. Their struggles speak louder than their words.
Numbers tell you what is happening. User interviews tell you why and more importantly, they make your team feel the user's pain.
When your engineering team hears a customer describe spending 3 hours on a task that should take 10 minutes, it hits differently than a metric on a dashboard. User interviews build organizational empathy that drives better decision-making.
When you are in the earliest stages before you know what to build user interviews help you explore the problem space without preconceived solutions.
This is discovery research: You are not validating a specific idea. You are trying to understand the landscape of user problems, unmet needs, and opportunity areas.
User interviews are most effective for:
Expert networks give you access to people who have the strategic, technical, or market knowledge that most users do not possess. Here is when to tap into expert networks:
When you are entering a new market or need to understand industry dynamics, experts provide the shortcut to knowledge.
Use expert networks to answer:
Real example: Before building a healthcare product, you might interview former hospital administrators, healthcare IT directors, and medical practice managers through an expert network. They will tell you about HIPAA requirements, the typical 18-month sales cycle for hospital software, and why 90% of healthcare startups fail to navigate procurement.
That is knowledge you cannot get from interviewing nurses or doctors who are end users.
Sometimes you need to validate whether your technical approach is sound before investing heavily.
Use expert networks to validate:
Interview engineers, CTOs, or architects who have built similar systems. They will save you from expensive technical dead-ends.
Expert networks excel at answering "how do we sell this?" questions.
Use expert networks to learn:
Example: You are building a security tool for financial services companies. Interview former CISOs at banks through an expert network. They will explain the 6-month vendor evaluation process, the security questionnaires you will need to complete, and why you need SOC 2 Type II certification before they will even take a meeting.
Want to understand what your competitors are really doing? Talk to people who worked there.
Expert networks connect you with former employees, consultants who have worked with competitors, and industry analysts who track the space. They provide insights you cannot get from public information or user interviews.
What you can learn:
(Legal note: Stay within ethical and legal bounds. Don't ask for trade secrets or confidential information.)
When leadership is making big bets entering new markets, pivoting products, M&A decisions expert networks provide the strategic perspective.
Use expert networks for:
Expert networks are most effective for:
Here is a quick reference table to help you choose:
Comparison of User Interviews and Expert Networks
The most successful product teams do not choose between user interviews and expert networks. They use both strategically at different stages.
Think of it this way:
You need both perspectives to build products that users love and that achieve business success.
Let's say you are building a B2B SaaS tool for HR teams at mid-market companies who occasionally need to make informed decisions by consulting industry specialists. You might benefit from learning about what expert networks are, their benefits, and how they work.
Phase 1: Market understanding (expert networks)
Phase 2: Problem validation (user interviews)
Phase 3: Solution validation (user interviews)
Phase 4: Go-to-market validation (expert networks)
Phase 5: Ongoing product refinement (user interviews)
Phase 6: Market expansion (expert networks + user interviews)
The order matters:
For NEW market entry: Start with expert networks to build foundational knowledge quickly, then move to user interviews for product validation.
For existing markets: Lead with user interviews to understand needs, then use expert networks when you hit strategic questions (pricing, distribution, competitive positioning).
For strategic pivots: Return to expert networks to validate the market opportunity, then user interviews to validate the product approach.
What it looks like: You interview 5 industry consultants who all say "Yes, this is a great idea!" so you build it. Then you show it to actual users who say "This does not solve my problem."
Why it happens: Experts have opinions about what the market needs. Users tell you what they actually need. These are not always the same.
The fix: Use experts for market validation, users for product validation. Do not skip the user step.
What it looks like: You interview 15 individual contributors who love your product, but you cannot figure out why enterprise sales are not closing.
Why it happens: In B2B, users do not equal buyers. The person using your product is not the person who signs the contract.
The fix: Interview experts who understand the buying process procurement leaders, former executives, sales leaders. They will tell you what you are missing.
What it looks like: An expert tells you "The market needs X," so you build X without validating with actual users.
Why it happens: Experts are persuasive and knowledgeable. It is easy to take their word as gospel.
The fix: Experts inform strategy; users validate product. Always confirm expert hypotheses with user research.
What it looks like: You spend 6 months building a product for healthcare, only to discover there is a compliance requirement that makes your approach unviable.
Why it happens: You relied on user interviews without understanding the broader market and regulatory landscape.
The fix: When entering new markets or industries, start with expert networks to understand the playing field before you build.
What it looks like: Asking experts about daily user workflows, or asking users about market size and competitive dynamics.
Why it happens: Lack of clarity about what each method is good for.
The fix: Use the decision framework below.
Use this simple framework to decide:
1. "What problems do our users face day-to-day?"
2. "How do users currently solve this problem?"
3. "Can users accomplish [task] with our product?"
4. "What do users think of [feature/design]?"
5. "Why do users behave this way?"
6. "What is the user workflow or journey?"
1. "How big is this market opportunity?"
2. "What is the competitive landscape and key players?"
3. "How do enterprise companies evaluate [product category]?"
4. "What are the regulatory or compliance requirements?"
5. "Is this technical approach viable at scale?"
6. "What are the key market trends?"
7. "What is the typical go-to-market motion?"
1. "Should we enter this new market?" (Experts for market validation + Users for problem validation)
2. "How should we price our product?" (Experts for market benchmarks + Users for willingness to pay)
3. "What is our competitive positioning?" (Experts for competitive intelligence + Users for differentiation insights)
Resources:
Resources:
User interviews and expert networks are not competing methods they are complementary tools in your research toolkit.
The bottom line:
The most successful product teams master both approaches and know exactly when to deploy each one. Do not choose between them. Choose strategically.
Access identity-verified professionals for surveys, interviews, and usability tests. No waiting. No guesswork. Just real B2B insights - fast.
Book a demoJoin paid research studies across product, UX, tech, and marketing. Flexible, remote, and designed for working professionals.
Sign up as an expert