Building a continuous user interview program at your company
Stop treating user interviews as one-off projects. Learn how to build a sustainable, continuous interview program that keeps your team connected to users and drives better product decisions.
Most companies approach user interviews like this: Product team has a question → scramble to recruit users → conduct 5-10 interviews → analyze → make decision → don’t interview anyone for 3 months.
This typical approach is rooted in project based research, where user research is conducted within the project world, isolated, finite projects with clear beginnings and ends. Unlike continuous discovery, this leads to limited customer insights and missed opportunities for ongoing improvement.
Then they wonder why they’re disconnected from users.
The best product teams don’t do user interviews as projects. They build continuous interview programs, a systematic, ongoing practice of talking to users that becomes part of how the company operates. Successful programs are team based, involving multiple team members in recurring customer conversations to foster collective understanding and empathy.
This guide shows you how to build that program from scratch, regardless of your company size or resources. A continuous user research program not only demonstrates business value by directly supporting strategic goals, but also helps teams create customer loyalty and engagement through ongoing, user-centered practices.
Why continuous user interviews matter
The problem with ad-hoc research
One-off interview projects create several problems compared to approaching market research basics:
Slow decision-making: Every research question requires spinning up from zero: recruiting, scheduling, interviewing. By the time you have insights, you’ve lost 3-4 weeks.
Loss of context: When you only interview occasionally, you miss how user needs evolve over time. You see snapshots, not the movie.
Research becomes a bottleneck: Teams wait for “the research team” to schedule studies. Research turns into a gate instead of a resource.
Insights go stale: You interviewed 10 users in January. It’s now September. Are those insights still valid? You don’t know.
Lack of organizational empathy: If only one person talks to users, only one person really understands them. The rest of the team is working from secondhand information.
The benefits of continuous research
Faster learning cycles: Always-on research means you can answer questions quickly or already have the answer.
Pattern recognition over time: You notice trends, shifts in behavior, and emerging needs that one-off studies miss.
Reduced risk: Small, continuous course corrections beat big, infrequent pivots.
Organizational muscle-building: User research becomes a skill everyone has, not just researchers.
Stronger user empathy: When everyone talks to users regularly, user-centric thinking becomes cultural, not aspirational.
Real-world examples
Stripe: Every employee, regardless of role, does customer support shifts. This keeps the entire company connected to user pain points.
Intercom: Product teams interview 2-3 users per week as standard practice. Research isn’t a special event—it’s Tuesday.
Netflix: Continuous research studies running at all times. For digital products like Netflix, ongoing iteration and improvement are essential, so product decisions are informed by the most recent data, not six-month-old studies.
Your company can do this too. You don’t need a dedicated research team or massive budget. You need a system.
The anatomy of a continuous interview program
A sustainable program has five components: it integrates ongoing research activities, leverages a variety of research methods, and supports an informed decision making process.
1. Consistent cadence
How often you interview depends on your team size and velocity:
For dedicated researchers: 8-12 interviews per week
For PMs leading research: 2-4 interviews per week
For early-stage startups (founders): 1-2 interviews per week minimum
Smaller teams may start with a lower cadence and simpler processes, then scale up as their needs grow.
The key: It’s regular and predictable, not sporadic and reactive.
2. Research backlog
A prioritized list of questions you need answered:
- Discovery: What problems exist in [area]? (Use the jobs-to-be-done framework to identify what users are trying to accomplish.)
- Validation: Does this solution work for [persona]?
- Usability: Can users accomplish [task]?
- Strategic: What’s the future of [trend]?
Maintain this like a product backlog: Add questions as they arise, prioritize by urgency and impact, work through them systematically.
3. Participant panel
A curated group of users (or potential users) who’ve agreed to be interviewed:
Size: 50-200 participants for small companies, 500+ for larger companies
Segments: Different personas, use cases, company sizes
Refresh rate: Add new participants regularly, retire inactive ones
This eliminates recruitment friction, the biggest bottleneck in ad-hoc research.
4. Repeatable process
Standardized templates and workflows:
- Interview script templates by research type
- Scheduling automation (selecting the right tool can streamline scheduling and coordination)
- Note-taking and recording setup (using a dedicated tool for note-taking and recording improves accuracy and collaboration)
- Analysis frameworks (analysis tools help organize and synthesize findings efficiently)
- Insight sharing formats
Goal: Reduce friction so anyone on the team can conduct an interview with minimal setup.
5. Insight distribution system
Research is worthless if it stays in one person’s head:
- Weekly research digests (Slack, email)
- Centralized insight repository
- Monthly research showcases
- Highlight reels and quotes in product reviews
- Video transcript for sharing verbatim user feedback
Make insights discoverable and consumable by the whole organization. Effective data analysis is essential for distilling and distributing actionable findings, ensuring that insights are accessible and inform decision-making across teams.
Setting up a research repository
A research repository is the backbone of any successful continuous discovery and user research program. It’s a centralized hub where your research team, product managers, and other stakeholders can store, organize, and access research insights, usability testing results, user interviews, and customer feedback. By making research data easily discoverable, a repository helps product teams stay continuously connected to their users and make smarter, faster decisions.
Why does this matter? Without a research repository, valuable insights often get lost in scattered docs, emails, or personal folders. This leads to duplicated efforts, missed opportunities, and a shallow understanding of customer needs and pain points. A well-structured repository, on the other hand, enables teams to build a deeper understanding of users, track patterns over time, and support assumption testing—all critical for effective product discovery and delivery.
How to build your program: step-by-step
Phase 1: foundation (weeks 1-4)
Goal: Set up infrastructure and processes
Start by defining research themes that will guide your discovery efforts. Make sure to cover a broad range of topics relevant to your product, users, and business goals. The team will be researching these themes using various methods such as interviews, surveys, and data analysis to gather actionable insights. This foundation ensures your discovery process is comprehensive and aligned with organizational objectives.
Week 1: define your research themes
What do you need to learn? Start broad:
When selecting research themes, aim to identify unmet needs and discover opportunities for product improvement. This approach helps ensure your research uncovers customer pain points and areas where innovation can make a real impact.
Example themes:
- Onboarding experience and first-value moments
- Feature X usage and pain points
- Competitive alternatives users consider
- Future workflow trends in [your domain]
How many themes? Start with 3-5 for focus.
Week 2: build your participant panel
Recruitment is your biggest bottleneck. Solve it now.
Where to recruit:
From existing users:
- In-app prompt: “Help us improve [product]. Get $75 for a 30-min interview.”
- Email campaign to engaged users
- Post-support survey: “Would you like to share feedback?”
From potential users:
- LinkedIn outreach (search by title/industry)
- Online communities (Reddit, Slack groups)
- User research platforms (User Interviews, Respondent)
Screening survey:
- What’s your role?
- What’s your company size?
- Which tools do you use for [task]?
- How often do you [relevant behavior]?
- Can we email you for future interviews?
Incentives:
- B2C: $50-75 gift card for 30 minutes
- B2B individual contributors: $75-100 for 45 minutes
- B2B executives: $150-200 for 45 minutes
Track in Airtable/Notion:
- Name, email, role, company
- Persona/segment
- Last contacted date
- Interview history
- Notes and tags
For a quick overview of market research industry statistics, trends, and projections, review this resource.
Involve other team members in recruitment and panel maintenance to share the workload and keep your participant panel up to date.
Week 3: create templates and processes
Templates to build:
- Interview guide templates (by research type)
- Discovery interview template
- Validation interview template
- Usability test template
Tip: When using interview guide templates, remember to observe participants’ body language—such as facial expressions, gestures, and posture—during interviews. Noting these non-verbal cues can help you build rapport and gather richer insights from your sessions.
- Scheduling workflow
- Calendly link for bookings
- Automated confirmation emails
- Reminder emails (24 hours + 1 hour before)
- Note-taking template
- Interview metadata (participant, date, focus area)
- Key insights
- Quotes with timestamps
- Action items
- Insight report template, see Affinity Map UX: A Practical Way to Synthesize Research for methods to turn research data into actionable insights.
- One-pager with top 3 findings
- Supporting evidence
- Recommendations
Tools setup:
- Video platform (Zoom, Google Meet)
- Recording and transcription (CleverX, Fireflies)
- Note repository (Notion, Dovetail)
- Scheduling (Calendly)
Week 4: run your first 2-3 interviews
Test your process with a few interviews before scaling:
- Does scheduling work smoothly?
- Are templates helpful or too rigid?
- Is note-taking manageable?
- Are insights actionable?
Iterate based on what you learn.
Phase 2: launch and cadence (weeks 5-12)
Goal: Establish rhythm and prove value
In the early stages of product discovery, it’s crucial to set a regular cadence for customer interviews and feedback sessions. Typically, a product trio—consisting of a product manager, a designer, and a software engineer, leads and participates in these interviews to ensure cross-functional insights and informed decision-making. This collaborative approach helps the team quickly identify user needs and validate assumptions, laying the foundation for a successful discovery process.
Set your target cadence
Start conservative and scale up:
Weeks 5-8: 1-2 interviews per week
Weeks 9-12: 2-4 interviews per week
Time block recurring interview slots:
- Tuesdays 2-4pm
- Thursdays 10am-12pm
Treating research like recurring meetings makes it routine, not reactive.
Weekly research rhythm
Monday: Review research backlog, select focus for this week
Tuesday/Thursday: Conduct 1-2 interviews
Wednesday/Friday: Analysis and synthesis
Friday: Share insights (see distribution below)
Create insight distribution channels
Option 1: Slack channel (#user-insights)
Post weekly:
This Week in User Research
Interviewed: 2 users about onboarding flow
Top insight: 6/8 users confused by Step 3 (account setup)
- Quote: “I didn’t know if I needed to connect my bank or could skip it”
- Impact: Drop-off spike at this step in analytics
Recommendation: Add “Skip for now” button with clear explanation
Full notes: [link to Notion]
Option 2: Monthly research showcase
30-minute meeting, 1st Friday of each month:
- Share top 5 insights from past month
- Play video clips of key moments
- Discuss implications for roadmap
- Take questions
Option 3: Insight repository
Notion/Dovetail database searchable by:
- Theme/topic
- Persona
- Date
- Product area
Make insights accessible. If people can’t find them, they don’t exist.
Measure early success
Track these metrics after 8 weeks:
- Interviews completed
- Participants in panel
- Research questions answered
- Stakeholder engagement (Slack views, meeting attendance)
- Engagement and buy-in from business stakeholders
- Product decisions influenced
Goal: Show value early to secure continued support.
Phase 3: scale and optimize (months 4-6)
Goal: Increase cadence, involve more people, deepen impact
Most teams follow similar scaling practices to deliver more value through continuous research and iteration.
Scale interview volume
Target: 4-8 interviews per week (See secondary research methods: complete guide for more information.)
How to scale:
Option A: Hire a dedicated researcher
- If you’re doing 50+ interviews per quarter
- If research is blocking product decisions
- If founders/PMs drowning in research work
- Consider hiring roles or implementing processes to support researchers as interview volume increases, ensuring research activities remain scalable and effective
Option B: Train PMs to conduct interviews
- Run interview training workshop
- Pair junior interviewers with experienced ones
- Review recordings and provide feedback
- Create a rotation schedule
Option C: Leverage customer success/support
- CS team already talks to users daily
- Train them to identify research opportunities
- Have them flag users for deeper interviews
Most companies use a hybrid: Dedicated researcher + trained PMs + CS partnerships
Democratize research
Make research a team sport:
Observation sessions:
- Invite stakeholders to watch interviews (muted, cameras off)
- Debrief together afterward
- Builds empathy and shared understanding
Rotating note-takers:
- Different team member takes notes each week
- Increases exposure and ownership
- Diversifies perspectives in analysis
Self-serve insight access:
- Searchable repository
- Video clip library
- Tagged and organized by topic
Monthly research training:
- 1-hour workshop on interview techniques
- Review good/bad examples
- Practice with role-playing
Optimize for efficiency
Batch similar interviews:
- Theme weeks: “Mobile app usability week”
- Interview 5 users on the same topic
- Faster pattern recognition
Use templates liberally:
- Interview scripts
- Analysis frameworks
- Report formats
Automate where possible:
- Scheduling (Calendly)
- Transcription (Otter, Fireflies)
- Reminders (automated emails)
- Research operations play a key role in optimizing these processes and scaling the impact of research by orchestrating workflows and resources.
Don’t automate the human parts:
- Building rapport
- Following up on interesting threads
- Synthesizing insights
Phase 4: mature program (6+ months)
Goal: Research as competitive advantage
To gain a competitive advantage, mature research programs integrate multiple methods and advanced analysis techniques. This includes not only gathering data but also analyzing how solutions users have addressed similar problems in the past. By studying these real-world user interactions and outcomes, teams can discover solutions that are more likely to meet actual needs and drive successful product development. This iterative approach, informed by user research and feedback, ensures that the solutions developed are validated and aligned with both user and business goals.
Advanced capabilities
Longitudinal studies:
- Interview the same users every 3-6 months
- Track how needs evolve
- Build long-term relationships
Multi-method integration:
- Combine interviews with surveys, analytics, usability tests
- Triangulate findings across methods
- Deeper, more reliable insights
Segmented panels:
- Power users panel
- Churned users panel
- Potential customers panel
- Interview different segments for different questions
Opportunity solution tree:
- Use the opportunity solution tree to visually map opportunities and potential solutions
- Prioritize which opportunities to address based on user insights
- Integrate findings to inform product development and reduce risk
Rapid response capability:
- Can answer urgent questions within 48 hours
- Panel is large and ready
- Process is streamlined
Organizational integration
Research informs roadmap planning:
- Quarterly research synthesis presented to leadership
- Top insights drive OKRs and priorities
- Product decisions explicitly tied to user evidence
- Developing organizational expertise in understanding users ensures that decisions are grounded in evidence, reducing bias and improving outcomes.
Research in product reviews:
- Every product proposal includes user evidence
- Video clips of users in stakeholder presentations
- “What did users say?” is a standard question
Everyone talks to users:
- Engineers shadow customer support
- Designers conduct usability tests
- Execs join research showcases
- User empathy is cultural, not departmental
Challenges and solutions
Challenge 1: “We don’t have time for continuous research”
Solution: Start small (1 interview/week), show value, scale.
Research saves time by preventing wrong decisions. One interview per week is 45 minutes, less than most meetings. To maximize participation, consider using a User Research Incentive Calculator to determine appropriate rewards for study participants.
Challenge 2: “Our users don’t want to talk to us”
Solution: Better incentives, shorter interviews, clearer value prop.
Try:
- Increasing compensation
- Offering product credits instead of gift cards
- Shortening to 20-30 minutes
- Emphasizing impact: “Your feedback shapes our roadmap”
Challenge 3: “Insights sit in docs and don’t get used”
Solution: Change how you share (video clips, Slack updates, showcase meetings).
Don’t bury insights in long reports. Make them:
- Visual (video clips)
- Bite-sized (one insight per post)
- Regular (weekly cadence)
- Accessible (searchable repository)
Challenge 4: “Too much data, can’t synthesize”
Solution: Regular synthesis cadences (weekly), better tooling.
Don’t wait for the perfect analysis. Share:
- Raw insights weekly (quick synthesis)
- Deeper patterns monthly (thematic analysis)
- Strategic trends quarterly (cross-study synthesis)
Challenge 5: “Leadership doesn’t value research”
Solution: Connect insights to business outcomes.
Instead of: “8/10 users mentioned pain point X”
Say: “Pain point X causes 15% drop-off in onboarding (analytics). Users are churning because of this. We can fix it in 2 weeks and recover 150 signups/month.”
Speak their language: revenue, retention, conversion, market share.
Scaling by company stage
Early-stage startup (0-20 people)
Cadence: 1-2 interviews/week
Who: Founders do interviews
Panel: 20-50 participants
Tools: Free tier (Zoom, Notion, Calendly)
Focus: Discovery and validation
Growth-stage (20-100 people)
Cadence: 3-5 interviews/week
Who: Founder + PMs share load
Panel: 50-150 participants
Tools: Mid-tier ($50-200/mo)
Focus: Feature validation, usability testing
Scale-stage (100-500 people)
Cadence: 10-20 interviews/week
Who: Dedicated researcher + trained PMs
Panel: 200-500 participants
Tools: Professional tier ($500-1000/mo)
Focus: All research types, multi-method
Enterprise (500+ people)
Cadence: 20+ interviews/week
Who: Research team (3-10 people)
Panel: 500+ participants, segmented
Tools: Enterprise tools + custom solutions
Focus: Research ops, democratization, strategic studies
Real-world success story
Company: B2B SaaS, 75 employees, Series B
Before continuous research:
- 2-3 research studies per quarter (ad-hoc)
- 6-8 weeks from question to answer
- Research bottleneck for product decisions
- Low confidence in roadmap priorities
After building continuous program (6 months):
- 60+ interviews per quarter (systematic)
- 3-5 days from question to answer
- Research accelerates decisions
- Product-market fit score improved from 6/10 to 8/10
What they did:
- Month 1: Built panel of 100 users, created templates
- Month 2-3: Established 3 interviews/week cadence
- Month 4: Trained 3 PMs to conduct interviews
- Month 5: Launched weekly insights Slack channel
- Month 6: Scaled to 12 interviews/week
By leveraging best practices from the researchops community and applying robust ux research methodologies, the company was able to streamline their research process and drive impactful product decisions.
Investment:
- $3,000/month in incentives
- 20 hours/week dedicated research time
- $100/month in tools
Return:
- Prevented 2 major feature failures (saved 8 weeks engineering time)
- Identified $500K revenue opportunity (new use case)
- Improved retention by 12% (fixed critical pain point)
ROI: 10x within 6 months
Getting started: your 30-day checklist
Week 1:
- [ ] Define 3-5 research themes
- [ ] Set up participant panel database
- [ ] Create interview guide templates
Week 2:
- [ ] Recruit initial 20-30 panel participants
- [ ] Set up scheduling and recording tools
- [ ] Create note-taking template
Week 3:
- [ ] Conduct first 2 interviews
- [ ] Test and refine process
- [ ] Set up insight repository
Week 4:
- [ ] Establish weekly cadence (1-2 interviews)
- [ ] Share first insights with team
- [ ] Get leadership buy-in for continuing
Conclusion: research as competitive advantage
Continuous user interviews aren’t a luxury. In today’s market, they’re table stakes.
The companies winning aren’t the ones with the most features. They’re the ones who understand users best—and understanding requires continuous connection.
Start small:
- 1 interview per week
- 20 participants in your panel
- Simple templates and tools
Scale deliberately:
- Show value first
- Prove ROI
- Then increase cadence and sophistication
Make it cultural:
- Everyone talks to users
- Insights drive decisions
- User empathy is your competitive advantage
Your users are ready to tell you what they need. Build the system that lets you hear them, every single week.