Human feedback collection template

What is human feedback collection for AI?

Human feedback collection for AI involves systematically gathering human judgments, preferences, and evaluations to train AI models that better align with human values and expectations. This process transforms subjective human preferences into structured data that can guide machine learning algorithms toward desired behaviors.

To understand how this fits into the broader AI training process, read our guide on what is human feedback in AI  and also explore how RLHF works in AI training.

Effective human feedback collection requires careful design of evaluation tasks, systematic training of human evaluators, and robust quality control measures. The goal is to capture nuanced human preferences consistently and at scale, providing AI systems with clear signals about what constitutes helpful, harmless, and honest behavior.

What is this human feedback collection template?

This template provides comprehensive frameworks for designing, implementing, and managing human feedback collection systems that produce high-quality training data for AI alignment. It includes task design methodologies, evaluator training programs, and quality assurance protocols that ensure reliable, unbiased feedback collection.

The template addresses the full lifecycle of human feedback collection, from initial task design through data preprocessing and quality validation. Whether you're collecting preferences for conversational AI, safety feedback for decision-making systems, or quality ratings for content generation models, this template provides the structure needed for successful outcomes.

Why use this template?

Many AI teams struggle with human feedback collection that produces inconsistent, biased, or unreliable data that fails to improve model performance. Without systematic approaches, feedback collection often suffers from evaluator disagreement, task ambiguity, and hidden biases that compromise training effectiveness.

This template solves critical challenges in human feedback collection:

• Inconsistent feedback across different evaluators and evaluation sessions
• Task designs that fail to elicit meaningful human preferences
• Systematic biases that skew training data toward particular viewpoints
• Quality control gaps that allow poor feedback to contaminate training datasets

This template provides:

1) Task design frameworks – Create evaluation tasks that consistently elicit the human judgments needed for effective AI training
2) Evaluator training and calibration systems – Ensure consistent feedback quality across all human evaluators through systematic training
3) Bias detection and mitigation protocols – Identify and reduce systematic biases that could compromise model alignment
4) Quality assurance workflows – Maintain feedback quality standards through continuous monitoring and validation
5) Scalable collection infrastructure – Build systems that can handle growing evaluation needs while preserving data quality

How to use this template

Step 1: Design evaluation tasks: Create clear, unambiguous tasks that elicit the specific types of human judgments needed for your AI training objectives. Ensure tasks are well-defined and consistently interpretable across evaluators.

Step 2: Plan evaluator recruitment and training: Identify evaluator requirements, develop comprehensive training materials, and implement calibration processes that ensure consistent feedback quality across all evaluators.

Step 3: Implement quality control measures: Establish systematic quality checks, inter-rater reliability measurements, and bias detection protocols that maintain feedback standards throughout collection.

Step 4: Execute feedback collection: Deploy your evaluation system with proper monitoring and support systems to ensure smooth operation and high participation rates from evaluators.

Step 5: Validate and preprocess feedback: Apply quality validation checks, identify and handle edge cases, and prepare feedback data for AI training pipeline integration. Learn more about fine-tuning large language models to understand how this feedback integrates with model training.

Step 6: Monitor and iterate: Continuously assess feedback quality, evaluator performance, and system effectiveness, making improvements based on data quality metrics and training outcomes.

Key collection methods included

1) Preference Comparison Collection: Systematic approaches for collecting human preferences between AI-generated alternatives, enabling training of reward models that capture human value judgments. Essential for RLHF and alignment training pipelines.

2) Quality Rating Assessment: Frameworks for collecting detailed quality ratings across multiple dimensions such as helpfulness, accuracy, and appropriateness. Provides nuanced feedback that supports comprehensive model improvement.

3) Safety and Harm Evaluation: Specialized protocols for collecting human feedback on AI safety, potential harms, and alignment with human values. Critical for developing AI systems that avoid dangerous or inappropriate behaviors.

4) Task-Specific Performance Feedback: Methods for gathering feedback on AI performance in specific domains or tasks, enabling targeted improvement in areas where human judgment is essential for quality assessment.

5) Bias and Fairness Assessment: Structured approaches for collecting human evaluations of AI fairness, bias, and equitable treatment across different groups and scenarios, supporting development of more inclusive AI systems.

If you're struggling with inconsistent human feedback that fails to improve AI model alignment, start collecting high-quality human judgments that drive meaningful model improvement.

‍